Atheists, what do you think of this?

These are some comments from a hardcore Christian on Youtube:

"There is ample evidence if you look for it. If you're willing to? see it, its everywhere. Its undeniable. Its why many of the top scientific minds are creationists.

No proper religions have formed within the past 100 years? What about Scientology?

Science is not an alternative to God its just what I've said it is. Imperfect man's imperfect & pathetic attempt to understand how the universe (which GOD made) works. You place higher faith in man's feeble understanding than the almighty?! Oh the ego.."


"Ever since my eyes have been opened, I CAN'T deny God exists. The evidence is all around me. I see it everyday.

"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that Asquith receiver; and he that seeker finder; and to him? that knocker it shall be opened." (Matt. 7:7-8)"


"I don't 'BLINDLY"accept anything. I require absolute proof that something is true in order to adopt it as my belief. Actually, I am far more fact driven than anybody else I find. I also debate the subject of Melisandra and? men's rights, I can easily drown people in overwhelming amounts of facts proving what I'm arguing is absolutely true, Yet often people still refuse to accept my assertions. For me. the existence of God is undeniable. God is a constant."


"The bible does not preach inhumane or horrible morals. If you honestly think the bible wants you to, say...kill people on Sundays for example, then you're grossly misinformed. "Honor the Sabbath" is something which dictates Christians give one day? of the week to God in which you do not work. This could be any day of the week. This is quite different from killing those who do not rest on Sundays. The rest of your examples are just as ridiculous."

And no, I'm NOT a Christian.

"Again, some of the worlds best and brightest scientists, (I'm talking NASA's geniuses with double PHD's and a lifetime of study under their belts) are CREATIONISTS. In fact these guys think it is utterly ridiculous that we still teach this big bang theory in schools because it is SOOO unbelievably debunked now by? many things."
Sorry average jane, I meant to say that I wasn't a Christian - I was referring to me.

Lying for Jesus is still lying.....and there are some whoppers in there.

I think it's a bunch of Bible verses which I have no intention in reading.

"Again, some of the worlds best and brightest scientists, (I'm talking NASA's geniuses with double PHD's and a lifetime of study under their belts) are CREATIONISTS.

- A person with a PhD in linguistics probably knows very little of astrophysics, and vice verse. A PhD doesn't qualify you as an expert in all fields.


"There is ample evidence if you look for it. If you're willing to? see it, its everywhere. Its undeniable. Its why many of the top scientific minds are creationists."

- This can also be evidence for every other religion ever conceived by man since the dawn of humanity...this doesn't qualify as evidence of God.

Belief is a choice. If you want to believe you will find yourself able to ignore things that contradict your belief. Being intelligent or a scientist (or both) will not help you if you want to believe.

A person who is a scientist and a christian is not applying scientific method to his belief.

You don't have to be "willing" to see evidence. I didn't read further than that. They should stop using the word when they don't know the meaning.

Lack of evidence that something exists does not mean its real.

Wow, that guy's got some kind of fantasy world going there.

I especially liked this part:
"I can easily drown people in overwhelming amounts of facts proving what I'm arguing is absolutely true, Yet often people still refuse to accept my assertions."

I wonder why that might be?

The person states that they are NOT christian. I'm not trying to have a pissing contest w/the brightest scientists...I simply do not feel, see, experience, or believe that a "higher power" controls our every move. And I DID grow up going to church.
Edit: oops, my bad...yes now I see that it is not in quotes. Well, to reiterate, hardcore Christan's will always say that atheists are just in denial. However, what THEY fail to see is that THEY are in denial; they truly do not understanding what atheism is.

1. Argument from ignorance. That's just the whole "the existence of the universe proves god because it couldn't have happened any other way.

2. "no proper religions" probably means every religion but his.

3. To call science pathetic is laced with irony since the person is posting this on the fucking Internet.

4. Repetition of No. 1

5. Don't care about scripture quotes.

6. Contradicts itself.

7. Clearly ignorant of their own holy texts. It DOES say "kill".

8. Name one.

So much trash in one place, I thought I'd ended up in the city dump for a minute there...

Anyhoo......I'd love to know who these NASA creationists are. Anyone want to email NASA to verify this factoid?

Smart man glad he's on our side, and when theists make the claim of god, you require proof from us right? Well how come I don't see atheists then giving proof of how that claim is illogical. I've posted and seen plenty of evidence on some questions and I just see atheists who post non sense and cry on how unfair we treat them and they still don't answer the question... Read some of the questions, you make fun of our religion/god everything we do.

So suck on it, Jesus says God Bless.

These made me laugh and cringe at the same time.

It's funny how he keeps citing the evidence that's everywhere, yet not once does he say what it is.

This ranting creationist is a failure and has somehow managed to lower my respect for theism even more.

Most of it is irrelevant. For example, the second line has came out of nowhere, I don't understand why you would say it. In a debate situation, I would shout out there and then "POA Irrelevant" and I would be right to do so.

He has said statements without facts, (paragraph 3; a quotation is not proof of a statement, an observation is. All it proves is that someone thought something). He then says he has overwhelming facts about Xianity being true, without stating any of them.

He then uses fallacies to argue his third last comment; he is saying, because A does not equal B, then A does not equal C. The Bible condones slavery (too many quotes to bother to find each one, so I just posted the link to a website with some), yet condemns women working in a church.

And your last statement is BS. We teach the Big Bang in school because it is the simplest way of explaining what we know. This is why we teach children firstly that atoms rotate in perfect circles, THEN teach, at a higher level, that each atomic shell rotates differently (the third one actually rotates in the shape of a penis; try teaching that to 14 year ODs).

We teach children firstly that only numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0 exist, the numbers countable on their fingers. Then we tell them that numbers go up for infinity. Then we introduce negatives. Then decimals. Then x, y, etc. then pi and e. Then sin, cos, tan, sing, etc. Then i. The list goes on.

Also, just because someone has a PhD, does not make them an expert in all fields; I could bet money that they do not know how to speak Aramaic, or know the works of Voltaire. Weak argument.

why almost all cosmologists are atheists: http://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/nd-paper/


I realize that *some* of the worlds most intelligent scientists are also members of various religions

in almost every case they tend to be members of moderate, liberal denominations.

as a person becomes more fundamentalist, they tend to become more and more dumb, until you get to people like Kent hound, who had to buy his PhD from a 'diploma mill' biblical college