Would it be fair to make a sweeping generalization about atheists and call all of the

I would think such a generalization would be appropriate given the circumstances.

I hope I'm not generalizing too much when I say you're always a bit dumb.

Sweeping generalization in general are not fair.

God is great!

I think it would be more fair to call you a pompous a$s.

That would be unfair, just as calling all Christians or believers
bigots

Peace

If atheists are pseudo-intellectuals, what does that make theists? Tards?

Would it be fair to generalize all Christians as pseudo-schizophrenics?

no more fair than it would be to say all religious people are ignorant and backwards. I think that one appropriate.

it is about as fair as drowning some baby behemoths in a giant flood.

In that atheists are skeptics and require evidence of claims, and thus have critical thinking skills, perhaps you're right. But to do so, you must admit that them it would be equally fair to make some sweeping generalizations about Christians and other people of religion, wouldn't it? I can think of a wide variety of less-than-flattering sweeping generalizations about theists that would have all of the validity of yours about atheists.

People who like to use the term "pseudo intellectuals" are in fact, pseudo intellectuals.

Saying "No" has absolutely no intellectual content whatsoever. Atheism has zero intellectual value. Asking questions is good. Trying to understand things is good. Atheism is infantile. My 2 year old nephew can say "No!" without having any good reason to. He's just excited to be able to say it.

This is poor trolling, even by R & S standards. You could try being funny, you know.

Not at all. I would say that most atheists I know are genuine intellectuals, not pseudo.

You seem to put down on Atheist a lot. Why waste all that time when you can be making your claims about your religion with actual evidence to claim you are right. I mean it's easy to point the finger and say "your wrong" so why not prove your claims.

No, but go ahead. Every other as shat thinks he has to make a generalization based on his prejudices, so why should you take the moral high ground and treat people as individuals.