Who, other than a man, ever put voice to the will of God?
Who, other than a man, ever put voice to the will of God?
We are told that we will be judged at the end of our lives. Judged by a God who will torture us forever in hell if we happen to not believe properly and follow his rules. This judgement will come even as we never get full disclosure by a God who hides from us. We are as some say, to choose heaven or hell, God or Satan, without having full knowledge of the conditions.
We are to believe that bible God is our real God yet that God is arguably a genocidal son murdering God. He is more akin to Satan than what any moral God would be.
All that we have in the way of information has been written by men.
Who other than a man ever put voice to the will of God?
For peace and stability, within religions, and possibly the world, a new man must be found to represent God within the various religions. Let us thank God that man has forsaken the Christian God as a lawmaker and ignore his barbaric laws.
That being the case as all believers have ignored or scrapped the Abrahamic bible God’s laws, since they do not live by them, should believers not elect a new God as scriptures indicate is supposed to happen at end times?
God was a human invention to begin with.
Should we not seek a new modern God who does not have the evil baggage that the current God has?
Our laws are certainly better than any God’s so it seems to me that we should elect a new God based on current law and not the draconian immoral laws of the old Gods. God has always been represented by a man. We should return to that system while recognizing that God has always been a myth.
If we study Buddhism and come to understand the compassion of the Buddha, we can also then understand the love of God through Jesus. They both provide a compassion that goes beyond this life and well into the next. They both live the phylosophy of life eternal. God didn't kill Jesus. The laws of Moses did. Moses, like Muhammad makes it a capital punishment for anyone to be Jesus-like.They are both false prophet-antichrists. They were/are very evil. Everyone needs to rid of man's laws governing people on how and who to worship. Jesus, and far eastern phylosophy is the ticket imo.
Last edited by Bag-Of-Hammers; 01-23-2012 at 04:54 AM.
If we study Buddhism and come to understand the compassion of the Buddha, we can also then understand the love of God through Jesus. They both provide a compassion that goes beyond this life and well into the next. They both live the phylosophy of life eternal. God didn't kill Jesus. The laws of Moses did. Moses, like Muhammad makes it a capital punishment for anyone to be Jesus-like.They are both false prophet-antichrists. They were/are very evil. Everyone needs to rid of man's laws governing people on how and who to worship. Jesus, and far eastern phylosophy is the ticket imo.
If you look at the policies that Jesus preached, you will find much unworkable rhetoric. Seems you do not recognize that.
Try justifying his-----let no man put asunder----eliminating divorce even if the wife gets beat twice a week.
Unworkable. His substitutionary atonement is also quite immoral.
It was God's plan from the beginning to have Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit. This can be demonstrated by the fact that the bible says that Jesus "was crucified from the foundations of the Earth," that is to say, God planned to crucify Jesus as atonement for sin before he even created human beings or God damned sin.
If God had not intended humans to sin from the beginning, why did he build into the Creation this "solution" for sin? Why create a solution for a problem you do not anticipate?
God knew that the moment he said "don't eat from that tree," the die was cast. The eating was inevitable. Eve was merely following the plan.
What kind of God would plan and execute the murder of his own son when there was absolutely no need to?
Only an insane God. That’s who.
The cornerstone of Christianity is human sacrifice, thus showing it‘s immorality.
If you look at the policies that Jesus preached, you will find much unworkable rhetoric. Seems you do not recognize that.
Try justifying his-----let no man put asunder----eliminating divorce even if the wife gets beat twice a week.
Unworkable. His substitutionary atonement is also quite immoral.
It was God's plan from the beginning to have Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit. This can be demonstrated by the fact that the bible says that Jesus "was crucified from the foundations of the Earth," that is to say, God planned to crucify Jesus as atonement for sin before he even created human beings or God damned sin.
If God had not intended humans to sin from the beginning, why did he build into the Creation this "solution" for sin? Why create a solution for a problem you do not anticipate?
God knew that the moment he said "don't eat from that tree," the die was cast. The eating was inevitable. Eve was merely following the plan.
What kind of God would plan and execute the murder of his own son when there was absolutely no need to?
Only an insane God. That’s who.
The cornerstone of Christianity is human sacrifice, thus showing it‘s immorality.
Regards
DL
The OT and the Koran is about controlling people out of a murderous jealosy.Once Moses gained the confidence of the Jews, he jealously, ruthlessly, using his standing as God himself, gave the order to stone to death anyone who doesn't sit in rememberance of his magnificance, and to kill anyone of any other teaching of God. There was no freedom of religion or freedom of expression. It is because of Moses's laws (which are the same laws as Islam's) that killed Jesus. Jesus was like any prisoner victim of the OT and/or the Koran, and it's antiChrist laws that targets anyone Christ-like. The Jews's attitude of wanting to kill Jesus came from the OT. They did it in the name of their God who Moses claimed made it a capitol crime for healing on the sabbath or for preaching a phylosophy of God that might contradict him. Jesus tried to change things and he got killed for it. God did not kill Jesus. God sent Jesus to preach the truth, and speak openly about the spirit in a land whaere it was a capital crime to do so. He sacrificed himself in the name of mankind. He was sent on a suicide mission to expose the laws of man from the laws of God.
Last edited by Bag-Of-Hammers; 01-24-2012 at 04:25 AM.
Who, other than a man, ever put voice to the will of God?
