have muslims succeeded yet in wiping out themiddle-easts Druze Alawaite Kurd Copt Arm

....and last but not least, sorely pressed christian and Jewish communities? or has the success of ISRAEL so far in defying the odds, in the face of so much hatred, given hope of liberation and independence, to all the minorities in the middle-east that have been suppressed held in contempt oppressed and discriminated against as dummies and fairs, by the bigotry that can so often be found in the attitudes and beliefs of Muslims, who, even if they dint espouse radical or Islams ideas, are so often infected by the general and widespread supremacist contempt and disrespect for the rights of people who happen to believe in another faith or who are atheists?

Since when Israel, this terrorist nation, has been helping anyone? What have you done other than killing innocent children and defenseless people? Go rot in hell.

I'm sure they are more lucky than the Muslims of Spain, or the pagans of Americas. At least they still exist today.

There is genocide Turks of Armenians. Armenian genocide is a big LIE.

http://www.radicalviews.org/index.php/analysis/politics/118-the-armenian-genocide-by-the-ottomansthe-big-lie.html
A Statement buried in the US archives:
This statement is in the form of a report made by two men who did not have any sympathy for the Ottoman Muslims. They were rather fanatically inclined to the Armenians and went to the region with a deliberate thought that the Armenians were a victimized nation, against whom the Muslims had committed group killings and slaughters, according to information taken from the misleading western media and from the American Protestant Missionaries, who did not deserve all trust as witnesses of the Muslims? sufferings, because they were excellent in deceptively recording acts against the Armenians in details. They were not honest also in recording acts against the Muslims, as reported by some historians! Therefore, who are these two witnesses who returned to America with a different mood than the one with which they set out to eastern Anatolia?
As for the report of Niles and Sutherland, they wrote:
? In the entire region from Bitlis through Van to Bayezit, we were informed that the damage and destruction had been done by the Armenians, who, after the Russians retired, remained in occupation of the country and who, when the Turkish army advanced, destroyed everything belonging to the Muslims. Moreover, the Armenians are accused of having committed murder, rape, arson and horrible atrocities of every description upon the Muslim population. At first, we were most incredulous of these stories, but we finally came to believe them, since the testimony was absolutely unanimous and was corroborated by material evidence. For instance, the only quarters left at all intact in the cities of Bitlis and Van are Armenian quarters ? while the Muslim quarters were completely destroyed.?

?Although it is not part of our investigation at all, one of the significant facts which affected us in every place of Bitlis and Trabzon, that we have passed through, was that the Armenians had committed exactly all the atrocities and group killings which the Turks had committed against the Armenians in other places. At first, we largely had doubt regarding all the narrations we have received, but the overall agreement of all the witnessed and the passion with which they discussed the evil acts perpetuated against them, and their apparent hatred towards the Armenians, besides all the materialistic proofs in the land itself, all this made us believe the authenticity of the facts in general.

First, the Armenians killed Muslims in a large scale and with various barbarity in their methods. Second, the Armenians were responsible for the destruction of most towns and villages. The Russians and the Armenians occupied the country for a long period (1915-1916), and it appeared that during that period, anarchy was limited, even though the Russians undoubtedly had caused much damage. In 1917, the Russian army was disbanded and left the authority in the hands of the Armenians alone. During that period, the Armenian militias patrolled the country, killing Muslim civilians. When the Turkish army moved towards Arzugan, Ardrom and Van, the Armenian army broke up and its soldiers or militias began destroying Muslim properties and killings mercilessly the Muslim inhabitants. The result was a completely destroyed country and a strong hatred towards the Armenians; a fact which makes it impossible for these two people to co-exist in the present time. The Muslims declared that if they were to be forced to live under the Armenian authority, they would rather fight, and it seems to us that they are likely to execute their threat. This opinion is shared by the Turkish, British and American officers that we have met.? (Mc Carthy: p253-254).
This is just a testimony about the organized killing perpetuated by the Armenians against the Muslims during the First World War, from 1914 to 1918 in the provinces of Van and Betlis, in east Anatolia, let alone the decrease of the number of Muslim inhabitants in the all eastern Ottoman provinces, such as Ardrom, Betlis, Diyar Bikr, the Al-?Aziz colony, Siwas, Halab and Trabzon. We will discover that in the period from 1912 to 1922, more than 62% of the Muslims in the province of Van were missing, 42% in the province of Betlis, 31% in the province of Ardrom and more than 60% in the Qoqaz!

Millions of Muslims were killed at the hands of the Armenians, the Russians, the Greeks, the Bulgarians, the Serbians and other enemies of the Othman Islamic state, in which lived under its reign various ethnic minorities in peace and security! Yet, no one asked for the punishment of the criminal perpetrators, who committed those group killings.
The Muslims who were and still are the victims of these gruesome killings are exposed as savage killers!