Go Back   Religion Board > Individual Religions > Christianity > Eastern Orthodoxy


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2008, 04:00 PM
krisssard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,650
Default Why didn't the first Protestants join one of the Eastern Orthodox Churches if they we

If they had their minds made up that they would not stay in the Catholic Church, why did they insist on reinventing Christianity instead of joining one of the Eastern Orthodox Churches which are not in communion with Rome? Is it because they wanted to do Christianity their way?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 04:00 PM
Starkather's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,660
It wasn't the Roman church they had issues with, it was the Church of England.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 04:00 PM
Pagan Earthgirl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,589
By the time of the Reformation, the Eastern Orthodox liturgy would likely have seemed too ritualistic to the Protestant mind. They wanted to break with established tradition, and that would probably include the Orthodox tradition, as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 04:00 PM
Yellow Rat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,577
Yes. Luther especially wanted to be a 'founder', not a joiner. If you look at the others, like Calvin, it seems to be the same. There were in fact political reasons behind the reformation as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2008, 04:00 PM
Blair's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,661
They still wanted to believe in the trinity which the Eastern Orthodox Churches do not believe in. That is why Arius was kicked out of the council of Nicene - he could not go for the trinity.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:00 PM
1-2informationalways's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,642
I believe the first protestant reformations were more a problem with the ruling governments taking hold of the church in their countries to use the church to manipulate their populations or to satisfy the desire of the king /queen or burgers(Sp)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 04:00 PM
Senator's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,621
They wanted a theology that doesn't jive with Eastern Orthodox Churches at all. The core beliefs of the early Protestants, for example, "salvation by faith alone," "so la Scripture," etc., were things opposed by Orthodox doctrine.

Also, Protestants were divided from the Eastern Orthodox by hundreds and hundreds of miles, not to mention a language barrier.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2008, 04:00 PM
auroraphoenix25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,656
Most of them knew that the Church as Jesus had set it up had long been lost. All they could do was their best and wait until God again chose a prophet to restore the Truth back to the world.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 04:00 PM
Amber K's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,591
Mainly because there were both political AND religious reasons for the Protestant rebellion.

The Eastern Orthodox churches hold most of the same doctrines that Catholics do such as the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, the apostolic priesthood, etc.

Once the "reformers" had gotten it in their heads to defy the Church they began to see the only solution as a new church. They would not have looked to Orthodoxy because there too is a hierarchy and a love for Holy Tradition.

Both Orthodox and Catholics reject the heresies of faith alone and scripture alone.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 04:00 PM
jeffchick1449's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,553
No its because they wanted to remain faithful to the scriptures.The catholic church had become as the churches that John speaks of in Revelations.Their candlestick had been removed.Look at Lev. 26:1 and 1 Timothy 4:1-3.To many man made doctrines had entered the church at Rome and something had to be done.The church at Rome had joined itself to the political movement there to gain power and influence.They had excepted the sun and moon gods into the church there and were even being persecuted by the church at Rome for their decision. Look for yourself. The sun and moon symbols remain in your church at Rome to this very day.Catholics follow the history of the church and not the Bible,but guess what ? Mexico and America don't agree on the history of the Alamo.They have their version and we have ours. God and His word will always remain true.It is a lamp unto my feet. When a church fails to agree with it there's problems and its not God fault but mans.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's the difference between Eastern Orthodoxy and Oriental Orthodoxy? Hermon Gerhing Eastern Orthodoxy 3 08-05-2010 02:36 PM
What are the different types of Christian faiths? I know there are like gnostic, bapt forsonclan03@yahoo.com Baptist 12 09-06-2009 02:04 PM
Are there any Eastern Orthodox churches in Harajuku, Japan? Amber K Eastern Orthodoxy 3 06-18-2009 01:45 PM
Did Eastern Orthodox Churches believe they could canonize any saints of their own aft Boomerang Eastern Orthodoxy 6 01-29-2009 01:10 PM
I am Christian and Protestant....i go to a congregational church....what is my type o 1-2informationalways Protestantism 11 08-06-2008 11:28 PM

 
Forum Stats
Members: 14,010
Threads: 50,396
Posts: 543,312
Total Online: 58

Newest Member: telson7

Latest Threads

Advertisement