Go Back   Religion Board > Individual Religions > Christianity > Eastern Orthodoxy


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2010, 08:58 AM
sarah_dtv's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,661
Default Did the Roman Catholic Church or the Eastern Orthodox Church come first?

Both claim that they are the first and original churches. Which one is correct, and what's the evidence? Oh, and evangelicals, don't give me the bull about Protestantism being first, everyone knows that's a joke; Catholicism and the Orthodox Church were the first Christian churches.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2010, 09:58 AM
Clo is a smart Turkey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,687
Believers of (Christ Jesus) or Christians came 1st -- not religion or any church !! Blessings--
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2010, 09:58 AM
XXX's Avatar
XXX XXX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,670
At first they were the same church.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2010, 09:58 AM
pacmaniacat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,613
Roman Catholic, then a branch split away, creating Eastern Orthodox.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2010, 09:58 AM
Nino F's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,618
neither...Christ is the head of the church (colossi ans 1:18)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:58 AM
Grains_of_Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,587
Both are a form of Catholicism but I believe it was the Eastern Orthodox before the Schism
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2010, 09:58 AM
Renna's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,626
One didn't come before the other. They started as an informal network of churches that gradually became more organized, and then split into the two separate branches of Christianity. This largely follows the split of the Roman Empire around the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2010, 09:58 AM
Javed Iqbal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,607
Are you serious? There are documents by the Catholic Church and about the Catholic Church by that name in every century since the first 10 years of the 2ND Century. There is no historical record of an Orthodox Church until the 11Th Century.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2010, 09:58 AM
forsonclan03@yahoo.com's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,657
Evangelical Christians came first.

The Evangelical Christians of the first century were not Protestants because there were no Roman Catholics to Protest against for at least 300 more years.

The New Testament called the early church, "The Way" and the "Church of God".

History tells us that the Roman Church did not get its start until about 371 AD.

The Orthodox Church broke away from Rome in 1054 AD. They claim that the Orthodox Church follows the original teaching. The word "Orthodox" means "original".

Roman Catholics believe they were first.

The Orthodox folks believe they were first.

The Bible disagrees with both group and teaches that Evangelicals were first.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:58 AM
Sarah Black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,689
Both. They used to be one Church, but they excommunicated each other in the year 1054 AD.

The Roman Catholic Church was founded by St. Peter
The Orthodox Church of Alexandria was founded by St. Mark
The Russian Orthodox Church was founded by St. Andrew
The Apostolic Orthodox Armenian Church was founded by St. Bartholomew and St. Jude Thaddeus
The Orthodox Syrian Church of India was founded by St. Thomas
The Orthodox Church of Jerusalem was founded by St. James the Just.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2010, 09:58 AM
misty0408's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,648
They both were created by Jesus Christ at the exact same time. If you ask a Catholic or someone in the Western tradition of Christianity, they will say that the Greek Orthodox Church split from them. The Greeks will say Catholicism split from them. Really, neither is wrong and neither is right. The only thing that is really important is that both agree that they are both in communion with Christ.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2010, 09:58 AM
Michael G's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,694
Both have valid claims.. in a sense, it kind of depends on how you look at it.

Historically, the Catholic church existed first, and the Orthodox church split off from it. However, because they were both the same church at one time.. AND because the Orthodox church still recognizes the Supremacy of St. Peter, and have an unbroken link back to the Apostles, both can technically claim to be the 1 true church.


The Eastern Orthodox church traces its lineage back to the Apostles.. when they founded the Churches in Jerusalem and Constaninople. HOWEVER, at that time.. the Eastern Orthodox church didn't exist, it was part of the Catholic or simply the Christian religion. So while the Eastern Orthodox can trace it roots back to Apostles.. it can't trace its EXISTENCE back to that time.

The Catholic church can both trace its heritage as well as its existence back that far, so it is historically the first.

Also, the Eastern Orthodox, although autonomous, still recognizes the catholic church as first and the primacy of Peter as the head of the Catholic religion.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2010, 09:58 AM
MaryAnne's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,646
There was only the Catholic Church which was composed of the Eastern/Asian branches and the Western Church until 1054 AD when both like two brothers in love with the same woman with Jealousness over who should be first in her life split from each other. So being first is not a point as the Church first began in Jerusalem as that was when Peter was made head of Christ Church on earth. And Peter eventually became the Bishop of Rome and it was Constantine who actually created the idea of the Head of the Church reside in Greece when he renamed the City there Constantinople and planned to move the empire out of Rome to there and at one point declared it the see of Peter but the Western Bishops refused to do it so the seed of rebellion was planted..
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2010, 09:58 AM
Cyndy E's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,660
They both come from the "root" orthodox church: the "One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church". The Assyrian and Oriental Orthodox churches split off from the main line of this church first; then some centuries later there was the East-West Schism where the church split into the Eastern Orthodox and the Roman Catholic churches. The Orthodox think of themselves as main line and Catholics as schismatics, the Catholics think of it as the other way around. So neither of them were "first" - they both had the same history up to the time of the schism and both of them technically came into existence at the same time under their current names.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2010, 09:58 AM
Michael Kelly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,632
Both.

The Orthodox and Catholic Churches were one and the same until they separated from one another in 1054 mainly over the role of the Pope.

There are very few theological differences. The main difference is that the Orthodox Churches (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11329a.htm) use the Byzantine Rite (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04312d.htm) and the Catholic Church use the Roman or Latin Rite.

Another difference is the Filioque clause in the Nicene Creed, the original which the Orthodox follow is
"And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, and giver of life, who proceeds from the Father."
And the Catholic revision is:
And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, and giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filioque

Pope John Paul II said of the Orthodox Churches in Orientale Lumen, "A particularly close link already binds us. We have almost everything in common."

For the entire document, see: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_02051995_orientale-lumen_en.html

With love in Christ.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2010, 09:58 AM
eridanus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,708
Jesus Made peter pope after he died when he asked him (some thing like this) " Do you love me " 3 times for the 3 times he betrayed Jesus ( OK not betrayed but i can't think of the word it's not disowned but basically it was saying he did not know Jesus ) anyway Jesus said peter will be the rock of the church the foundation. after years the religion spread and the Vatican was now located in ROME because peter died there ( nailed to the cross upside down) years later saint Paul was bringing the religion to more places but due to the location of the place hills and mountains surrounded it and they couldn't reach the Vatican. that is the Celtic catholic , and the Anglican was king Henry the 8Th.

So everything started with the catholic Church
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the difference between the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church? Jessica Eastern Orthodoxy 3 08-09-2010 06:41 AM
Why did the Roman Catholic Church separate from the Eastern Orthodox Church? traceyquirk@sbcglobal.net Roman Catholicism 9 05-23-2009 09:51 AM
Is the Roman Catholic Church or the Eastern Orthodox Church the true Church? jennyann 4 Roman Catholicism 15 05-12-2009 08:26 AM
What are fasting regulations for the Eastern Orthodox Church? For the Catholic Church Michael Kelly Eastern Orthodoxy 5 10-17-2008 06:50 AM
what is the difference of the Roman catholic church and the Eastern Orthodox church? Brandon R Eastern Orthodoxy 12 10-08-2008 06:42 AM

 
Forum Stats
Members: 14,010
Threads: 50,396
Posts: 543,312
Total Online: 63

Newest Member: telson7

Latest Threads

Advertisement