|
I think you're on to something here.
I've read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the guys who started Dan Brown on the Da Vinci Code stuff, but who were silly enough to take it seriously instead of just writing entertaining fiction). I've read some Gnostic writings. There's a similarity.
I think there's a specific point to Gnosticism that is separate from the conspiracy-theory enthusiasm, though. The Gnostics all seemed to argue that the saving value of the knowledge (nosies) had to do with rejecting the material world as irredeemably flawed and committing to a notion of spiritual (that is, non-physical) existence as being of primary importance. The details of their explanations vary, but they all boil down to the notion that creation of the physical world was itself an error, and the god that did it was inferior to the real God of all.
Most of the conspiracy theories seem to go the other way; they all go looking for some secret physical token with magical or political significance. In that sense, they seem to be the opposite of true gnosticism, while at the same time satisfying similar emotional desires.
|