What Vedas and Hindu holy books state about our beloved Prophet Muhammad(peace be upo
As if their holy books mention Prophet Muhammad(peace be upon him) than does that mean Hindu scriptures are true and so did our Prophet Muhammad(peace be upon him)
And Hindu should also accept him as their savior
Please give detail about what is written in the scriptures?
@devil's advocate
I am not reporting anyone and till one doesn't use any abusive content to hurt religious
sentiment nothing is wrong.right.
and i just wanted to knew about what your scriptures say.
As it is said that prophet was the 10Th reincarnation of supreme soul.just let me know about that too..
thank you
i dint understand Ur question Hindus
can not accept prophet Mohamed as their savior
there is nothing of mention in Hindu old books about prophet Mohammad
Do not say that the Hindus should also accept Mohamed as their Savior.
Why should the Hindus accept the Satan as their savior? The Devil himself personified and came to Arabia.
If my answer is reported, then the question shall also be reported for deletion.
To you your religion, to me my religion.
Hinduism and Islam have nothing in common.
http://www.hinduism.co.za/kaabaa.htm
The Kaaba was originally a Hindu Temple. The Satan destroyed it.
600million Hindus killed by the Muslims
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/TF5PUKFQU03U2MR4P
http://answering-islam.org/Silas/borrowing.htm
Mohamed the borrower. It is said that Mohamed borrowed from many religions ( in to days' language it is called plagiarism).
Was Islam a revelation of Allah?
http://agniveer.com/2117/revelation-allah/
Zakir Naik claims Prophet in Hindu Scriptures ? An analysis (Part 1)
http://agniveer.com/474/prophet-hindu/
http://agniveer.com/series/zakir-hindu/
Shaming the Shameless Apologists of Islam: Allah in the Vedas
by Ibrahim Lone
http://www.islam-watch.org/Ibrahim.Lone/Shaming-Shameless-Muhammad-in-Vedas.htm
Muhammad is not predicted in Hindu scriptures
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/Prasadh51229.htm
A Critical Assessment of Muhammad by the Bangladeshi Apostates, Part 1
by Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari
False Portrayal of Islam and Muhammad by Hindu Monks
http://www.islam-watch.org/Brahmachari/Critical-Assessment-of-Muhammad-by-Bangladeshi-Apostates.1.htm
Edit:- @ ask er -- Basically your question was wrong on two counts.
A well known and accepted principle in reasoning is that if a part is accepted as the truth, then the whole has to be accepted. You cannot be selective in selecting the truth , something which suits you and rejecting the parts which does not conform to your belief. You either accept the whole or reject the whole.
If you accept the whole, fine, then come and convert to Hinduism. You are welcome.
Secondly, you said.... AND HINDU SHOULD ALSO ACCEPT HIM AS THEIR SAVIOR.
When a Hindu views Mohamed as the Devil, then why should a Hindu accept him as his savior?
Got it?
Thanks.
Edit 2 :- @ ask er - Muslims like you have a grandiose view about Islam. You believe and are fed lies all the way that Mohamed is prophesied in Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. All your evangelists are brainwashing the gullible and innocent people from other religions into believing such stupidity and for converting them to Islam. All the religions have refuted this.
They come along with the claim that they are students of comparative religion and instead of respecting other religions - they ridicule other religions. Zakir Naik is one of them - a Hypocrite. Trying to convert others in the name of studying religion and seeking knowledge. TAQQIYAH
Bing/google any intelligent anti islam websites, you will get the correct picture of Islam. Your eyes will be truly opened about Islam. Why Nonie Darwish, Parvin Darabi, Ayesha Ahmed, Wafa Sultan, etc left Islam. Why Ali Sina, Ibn Warraq, etc. left Islam.
Visit these sites and read the testimonials of why people left Islam
faithfreedom.org
apostatesofislam
wikiislam
islamwatch
thereligionofpeace
jihadwatch
formermuslimsunited
If you have any doubts, feel free to email me. You can email me from my profile/activity.
edit 3 :- @ Reverie - you have given a fine answer
Edit 4 - @ asker - Since you have asked about the Prophesy about Mohamed being made, I would like to say that the Sikh religion, which was founded after Islam, has made a prophesy about Islam. Guru Nanak Dev has said that Islam will be destroyed by the rebirth of Guru Gobind Singhji. Read Karni Nama and Raj Nama at the bottom of the page.
http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Guru_Nanak_in_Mecca
Assalam Alaikum dear sister. The Prophet Muhammad saws coming has been mentioned in many previous remnants of knowledge. Eg in the bible, and in the Hindu scriptures. So those of their followers who study their own books properly, and research the Qur'an and the message of Islam should easily come to the accept Islam and the Prophet Muhammad.
Prophet Muhammad (pub) in Hindu Scriptures by Dr. Zakir Naik > http://www.islam101.com/religions/hinduism/Mhs.htm
Allah Set said :
S's A??????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????????????? ????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ???????????
27:93. And say [(O Muhammad ) to these polytheists and pagans etc.]: "All the praises and thanks be to All?h. He will show you His Ay?t (signs, in yourselves, and in the universe or punishments, etc.), and you shall recognise them. And your Lord is not unaware of what you do."
And Allah swt has spoken the Truth. It is up to the Hindus, Christians, Jews, and everyone else to research and learn the truth and accept it, before the Day Of Judgement, when it will be too late. Wassalam.
Scriptures & Vedas are as old as 5000 years and Prophet Mohd visited this planet only 1500 years back. your suggestion do not corroborate with the facts and if some scholar has done some wrong , entire historical facts cannot be denied but if you are so sure why not accept Veads and Scriptures of Hindus with Holy Book Quran.
There is nothing about Muhammed in Hindu Texts as Zakir Naik claims. He is distorting the facts.There are so many articles and you tube clips available on the net. Please try it. Then you will know how he is making facts distorted.
For example he will say there was a king named Stevana (Always truth full).And now he will conclude that he is Muhammed. He say that there is name for Muhammed mean Truth full.Everyone with common sense can find out the flaw.In every country there will be such man who is famous because of his truthfulness.
Vedas will never tell about individuals. It states the true sense of facts. Since they are very very very old and not taught by any one and they came out of the God face, they are always UN changed. It is the persons who had been, have been changing the interpretations according to their convenience since ages.
Hinduism respects all the prophets. The clean proof is that Hindus worship, Lord Rama, Lord Krishna, Shirdi Saab etc., To my knowledge, some Hindus go to Dargas for off erring prayers.
In nutshell, it is to say that the main quality in Hinduism is " TOLERANCE". This is not out of inefficiency, it is out of affection and respect for others.
None. Muhammad was not even born during the medic period, so there is no question of any mention, every Semitic re legion gives importance to the prophets as they do not believe that god is accessible to the mortals and has to be approached through such prophets which gave them such exalted status.
Hindu is not a re legion it is a way of life, it is a celebration of being a human being. you are free to worship the god of your choice based on your mental make up. It is the true essence of freedom and responsibility, and moreover Veda means science and every description is a scientific fact explained in simple to understand form, since a layman cannot understand complex scientific theorem but is free to enjoy the technology arising out of it, the same way medic scripts guides you to reach higher levels.
One need not depend on any mortal to save him, it is the faith that moves mountains which can be experienced if and only if you have an open mind.. god bless all.
@ Abdulmalik- Mohammad's name is never mentioned in the entire Bible, let alone his coming or his prophet hood. The more Christians study the Bible, the less likely they are to accept Islam. The so called 'bible' Muslims claim to be the true Bible, is the gospel of Barnabas, written by a 14Th century Muslim. The Gospel of Barnabas is not an authentic Gospel of Jesus. The book is a rewrite of the Biblical Gospel most likely by a Muslim who wanted to portray Jesus as a Muslim who taught Islam and predicted the coming of Muhammad. This type of rewriting has been done elsewhere by Muslims in the Gospel According to Islam. It is disgraceful for Islamic leaders to continue to publish, promote and distribute this false Scripture. It is disgraceful for them to create this deliberate confusion and make mischief.
The old art of marketing, ?That a lie shouted thousand times becomes a truth!?
that's what ZakIraik try to sell
There is not a single mention of mohammad in vedas though in bhavishya purana there is
Please go through. see this.....
(meaning of mohamada refered here means maha= great and mada= swagger or full of madness)
"Muhammad is mentioned, as Mah?mada, in III.3.3.5-27. The passage states his origin in Arabia and portrays him as a dharmad??aka ("polluter of righteousness/Dharma"), a preceptor of pai??chadharma ("ghoulish religion"), and a reincarnation of Tripur?sura, a demon whom Lord Shiva will destroy again.[22]......
"11.2 The Prediction of Islam
[From the third part of the Pratisarga Parva.]
Shri Suta Gosvami said: In the dynasty of king Shalivahana, there were ten kings who went to the heavenly planets after ruling for over 500 years. Then gradually the morality declined on the earth. At that time Bhojaraja was the tenth of the kings on the earth. When he saw that the moral law of conduct was declining he went to conquer all the directions of his country with ten-thousand soldiers commanded by Kalidasa.
He crossed the river Sindhu and conquered over the gandharas, mlecchas, shakas, kasmiris, naravas and sathas and collected a large ammount of wealth. Then the king went and his followers to the great god, Lord Shiva, situated in the desert. He bathed Lord Shiva with Ganges water and worshipped him in his mind with panhcagavya (cow milk, ghee, yoghurt) and sandalwood paste, etc. After he offered prayers with complete devotion and pleased him.
Suta Goswami said: After hearing the king?s prayers, Lord Shiva said: O king Bhojaraja, you should not go to the place called Mahakakshvara, that land is called Vahika and now is being contaminated by the mlecchas. In that terrible country there no longer exists dharma. There was a mystic demon named Tripura, whom I have already burnt to ashes, he has come again by the order of Bali. He has no origin but he achieved a benediction from me. His name is Mahamada and his deeds are like that of a devil. Therefore, O king, you should not go to this land of the evil. By my mercy your intelligence will be purified. Hearing this king came back to his country.......
That city is known as their site of pilgrimage, a place which was Madina or free from intoxication. Having a form of a ghost (Bhuta),
The symptoms of the followers of devil will be that they first of all will cut their genitals, have no shikha, but having beard.......Therefore, they will be known as musalman."....
There will be a man from deserts, Mahamada (Mohammad), the preceptor of mleccha-dharma who will tell his followers to eat cow and not eat pig. He will spoil all the religions and will behave like an Asura (demon). His followers will bring destruction in world
As I have put those versus that has nothing to proud about for you but certainly you must be.......
And if zakir naik is so interested in our scriptures
Why not he read and follow them ?
Now the tenth reincarnation of Lord vishnu is kalkipurush
and by our scriptures there are yet many years to come
so, that is complete false and baseless
and if you believe that prophet was 10th reincarnation than it is better to follow
"Bhagawad Geeta" than kuran and worship the supreme soul Lord Vishnu