Who wrote the bible, the koran, and the torah?

and what were they trying to achieve?

Why Word Inspired by God (Bible) has three genealogies of Jesus pub.
How could the "inspired words" of God get the genealogy of Jesus incorrect (See Matthew 1:6-16 where it states 26 forefathers up to Prophet David, and Luke 3:23-31 says 41 in number). Or for that matter, give a genealogy to Jesus who had NO father?

There is difference of centuries between II Kings 19:1-37 and Isaiah 37:1-38.Why both has same verses.
See II Kings 19:1-37, now read Isaiah 37:1-38. Why is it that the words of these verse are identical? Yet they have been attributed SAME WORDS to two different authors, one unknown and the other is Isaiah, who are centuries apart; and yet, the Christians have claimed these books to be inspired by God.

What is According to:
Christians boast about the Gospels according to Matthew, according to Mark, according to Luke and according to John. However, if we think about it, there is not a single Gospel according to Jesus himself. According to the preface of the KJV (King James Version) new open Bible study edition, the word "Gospel" was added (see below) to the original titles, "According to John, according to Matthew, according to Luke and according to Mark." Incidentally, why does every "Gospel" begin with the introduction According to. Why "according to?" the reason for this is because not a single one of the gospels carries its original author?s autograph!

Luke never met Jesus pub, Is the gospel of Luke really a hearsay.
If you read Luke 1:2-3, you will learn, as I did, that Luke (who was not one of the 12 disciples and never met Jesus) said that he himself was not an eyewitness, and the knowledge he gathered was from eyewitnesses, and not as words inspired by God. Incidentally, why does every "Gospel" begin with the introduction According to. Why "according to?" the reason for this is because not a single one of the gospels carries its original author?s autograph! Even the internal evidence of

Was ?Gospel according to Matthew? was not written by Matthew, according to Bible?
Matthew 9:9 proves that Matthew was not the author of the first Gospel which bears his name:
"And as Jesus passed forth thence, He (Jesus) saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and He (Jesus) saith unto Him (Matthew), follow me (Jesus). And he (Matthew) arose, and followed Him (Jesus)." Without any stretch of the imagination, one can see that the He?s and the Him?s of the above narration do not refer to Jesus or Matthew as its author, but a third person writing what he saw or heard - a hearsay account and not words inspired by God.

Did Pagan Constantine contribute in writing the word of God?
It is worth noting, and well known throughout the religious world, that the choice of the present four "gospels" of the New Testament (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) were imposed in the Council of Nicea 325 CE for political purposes under the auspices of the pagan Emperor Constantine, and not by Jesus. Constantine?s mind had not been enlightened either by study or by inspiration. He was a pagan, a tyrant and criminal who murdered his son, his wife and thousands of innocent individuals because of his lust for political power. Constantine ratified other decisions in the Nicene Creed such as the decision to call Christ "the Son of God, only begotten of the father."

Which gospels bluntly removed from Bible?
Literally, hundreds of gospels and religious writings were hidden from the people. Some of those writings were written by Jesus? disciples, and many of them were eyewitness accounts of Jesus? actions. The Nicea Council decided to destroy all gospels written in Hebrew, which resulted in the burning of nearly three hundred accounts. If these writings were not more authentic than the four present gospels, they were of equal authenticity. Some of them are still available such as the Gospel of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas which agree with the Quran. The Gospel of Barnabas, until now, is the only eyewitness account of the life and mission of Jesus.

Men.
Power.

Not guilty on this one.

Most of these books were not "written" but complied by many people.

The Quran for instance was compiled by Ethan r during his turn as caliph. He had recitations collected, choose the ones he thought most valid and put it together in a book. the put it out as a standardized book though the empire.

With the bible, it is similar. There were many writings, they got together, collected and studied them, took the ones deemed most correct, and complied them together, and put it out as a standardized book

Men.
Supremacy.

They were all written by mortal men..
Power and control of the masses..
The Pope is well aware that Christianity is a false religion, there is enough proof hidden in the bowels of the Vatican to expose this...
Everytime something emerges that goes against the brainwashing, it is put down as heresy...
You don't really think that the Pope and his many minions want to lose their life of luxury and their position do you ??
Blessed Be... )O(

Some guy named frank wrote it as a joke. However humans being gullible and stupid as they are took it as fact and spread it.

Torah and the rest of the Bible were written by several people over many, many years. The Torah was probably written in about a 500 year time period.

The Bible was written anywhere between 1000 BCE and about 95 AD. Again...not by one person.

The Koran was written down by followers of Muhammed and is believed to be the exact wording of the message he received.

"what were they trying to achieve?"
They were relating experiences of God.

Matt

they were written and compiled by people with political, financial and control goals.
they even included hints inside them that indicate that they were the product of human genius and imagination but not of divine words.