Sikhism, why this victim mentality, from great warriors. Claime that sikhism was pers
I answered and was reported.
I have not heard, or seen any thing bad about Sikhism. For once I agree with Buddha's brother. You are ignorant, your perceived persecution is a delusion. Hindu Panjabi families contributed their first born to Sikhism. It was a reformation of Hinduism, needed at that time. I am a Hindu, but I often go to Gurudwara, I participate in the readings, kittens, and Langar. Forget Sheromony Akhali Dal, and that Gunda Bhinderwal, show me one sentence, against a Hindu God or philosophy in guru Grant sahib (i have read it from beginning to end). Before dishing Hindu for 1984, ask why so much arms were assembled in Gurudwara. Every government acts against illegal activity in ant house of prayers. America in Waco, Texas, Pakistan, red mosque. Once you start doing illegal things in a house of prayer, the sanctity of the house vanishes, with that you loose privilege. The attack was justified on national grounds.
If an arm is gangrened you amputate the arm so that rest of the body can be saved. Sikhism was probably saved by that action.
well i didn't understand your question, but if u r saying that we Sikhs r ignored no we r not. after 84 everything is changed our religion is changed. u can see many Sikhs in 1000 but u can't say that they r Sikhs Cox Sikhs loose their identity by themselves. here in western world everybody agree with KALISTAN in Hindi Kali means empty why u want the place empty which is already empty? yes making a prayer place a place to hide and showing their power is not good, but u know in Punjab people praised handrailAla a god, but i hate him he kills so many people for nothing. he is a cowered.
I don't want to argue on this matter. If the arguments be started now then there will be no end. Actually what happened in the past is only due to our faulty political reasons. In this I think Indira Gandhi play a very bad roll. Just to gain her Political Mileage, she used the dirty politics in Punjab to get avenge from Akalis. She supported Bhinderawala's Group indirectly & powered him a lot in Punjab. But la tor on the same person become heavy on all & at last all you know what happened in Punjab & In India. I disagree with the other answerer that Punjab people love Bhinderawala. This is wrong. Only there are few people who are with his idolize.
only some ignorant Sikhs, due to Pakistan's fingering said Sikhs are different from Hindus
only ignorant Sikhs and Hindus would deny the truth
Sikhs are beautiful people, and they finally understood the game plan of Pakistan, that those who killed their people and raped their women in 1947, were trying to use them as pawns against India
Congress party is also partially responsible for this
Guess what...my answer was deleted as well. This is what I wrote:
You are stupid....If I say that Sikhism is a part or a branch of Hinduism, how the hell can you interpret that as something bad. If I had a negative attitude towards Sikhism, why would I wish to connect it to Hinduism??? Wouldn't it be logical for me to distance Sikhism and Hinduism if I had a negative attitude towards Sikhism??? Sikh people like you are so stupid that it angers me. You want Sikhism to be viewed alongside the AbrahamICCeligions but you don't want it to be viewed alongside the diatomic religions of India. I consider the Sikhs to be one of me. I do not make a difference and I think that it is SO and dumb that today Hinduism, Sikhism and Jainism as well as Buddhism are viewed as different religions as opposed to one unit. I accept that Sikhs are very angry with us because of the 1984 riots, but you must remember that the [BLEEP] who killed sikhs were NOT HINDU!!!! They were communists, marxists, leftists, pseudo secualrists and congress party members. These people are against Hindus as well. You are forgetting that they killed thousands of hindus in 1947. Sikhism is a part of Hinduism because it is 90% identical. The Sikh gurus died defending Hinduism and Guru Gobind (peace be upon him) established the khaisa to save sanatan dharma from Islam. Guru nanak NEVER intended to establish a separate religion neither did he refute Hinduism. His purpose was to ADD to Hinduism, to CONTRIBUTE to Hinduism and most fundamentally to REFORM Hinduism. Thus, how can anyone expect us Hindus to consider Sikhism as an independent religion??? Especially in light of the fact that Guru nanak himself visited the Hindu temple, himself condoned the worship of Sri Ram, Guru gobind recited the Gayatri mantra and in the guru granth there are hundreds of references to the Vedic deities (such as Gauri, Shiva etc etc etc).
I think you better close this Q before we get reported again
Sikhism, why this victim mentality, from great warriors. Claime that sikhism was pers
